EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

ORAL RIGOSERTIB COMBINED WITH AZACITIDINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML) AND MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS): EFFECTS IN TREATMENT NAÏVE AND RELAPSED/REFRACTORY PATIENTS
Author(s): ,
Shyamala Navada
Affiliations:
Tisch Cancer Institute,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,United States
,
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Affiliations:
MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,United States
,
Katherine Hearn
Affiliations:
MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,United States
,
Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig
Affiliations:
Tisch Cancer Institute,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,United States
,
Erin Demakos
Affiliations:
Tisch Cancer Institute,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,United States
,
Pierre Fenaux
Affiliations:
Hôpital Saint-Louis University,Paris,France
,
Michael Petrone
Affiliations:
Onconova Therapeutics,Newtown,United States
,
Patrick Zbyszewski
Affiliations:
Onconova Therapeutics,Newtown,United States
,
Steven Fruchtman
Affiliations:
Onconova Therapeutics,Newtown,United States
Lewis Silverman
Affiliations:
Tisch Cancer Institute,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,United States
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Navada S. 06/24/17; 181775; S488
Shyamala Navada
Shyamala Navada
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: S488

Type: Oral Presentation

Presentation during EHA22: On Saturday, June 24, 2017 from 16:30 - 16:45

Location: Room N105

Background
Azacitidine (AZA) is first line therapy for patients (pts) with higher risk MDS and demonstrated efficacy in older pts with AML (Dombret et al, Blood 2015; Fenaux et al, J Clin Oncol 2010)Rigosertib (RIG) interferes with the RAS-binding domains of RAF kinases and inhibits the RAS-RAF-MEK and the PI3Ks pathways.  In vitro, the combination of RIG with AZA synergistically inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of leukemic cells in a sequence-dependent manner (Skidan et al, AACR 2006). RIG’s effective inhibition of human hematopoietic tumor cell lines in vitro, favorable clinical adverse event (AE) profile, and its synergy with AZA suggests the potential value of combination treatment.

Aims
Phase I/II results are presented for pts with MDS, either hypomethylating (HMA) treatment naïve or progressing on or failing to respond to prior HMA, and those with AML (per WHO 2002 criteria) with relapsed or refractory disease

Methods
Oral RIG was administered twice daily on Day 1-21 of a 28-day cycle in escalating cohorts and then at the recommended Phase II dose (560 mg qAM and 280 mg qPM).  AZA 75 mg/m2/d SC or IV was administered for 7 days starting on Day 8. A CBC was performed weekly, and a bone marrow aspirate/biopsy were performed at baseline, D29, and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Response was determined by IWG criteria for MDS (2006) and AML (2003).  Stable disease in AML was defined as not meeting criteria for any other treatment response (CR, CRi, PR, disease progression, or treatment failure).

Results
The combination of oral RIG and AZA was administered to 54 pts, of whom 40 had MDS; HMA-treatment-naïve (N=23) and previously HMA-failed pts (N=17).  17 MDS pts received prior HMA therapy: 12 AZA, 4 decitabine, and 1 both.  Ten pts had AML, and 6 had CMML.  2 MDS patients with 20-<30% marrow blasts were also included in the AML analysis.  Median age was 68 years; 67% of pts were male; and ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 95% of pts.  Pts have received 1-37+ cycles of treatment (median, 3.5 cycles), with a median duration of treatment of 17 weeks (range 4 to 158+ weeks).

 
Of the 10 pts with AML, 6 had relapsed AML, 2 secondary AML and 2 with AML transformed from MDS. Eight pts were evaluable for response.  There were 3 responses seen, for an ORR of 37.5%, with responses in both secondary and refractory AML.  Two additional pts had stable disease (25%). Responses were durable, with the longest response approaching one year (Table 1).
 
Among 33 evaluable MDS pts, overall response by IWG criteria was 76%: complete remission (CR) in 8 (24%), concurrent marrow CR (mCR) and hematologic improvement (HI) in 10 (30%), mCR alone in 6 (18%), and HI alone in 1 (3%).  Overall response was 85% in HMA naïve pts and 62% in HMA resistant pts.  Correlative studies suggest that RIG has chromatin modifying effects in combination with AZA which may overcome clinical AZA resistance (Chaurasia EHA 2017). Median duration of CR was 8 months for the combination.  Median time to initial response was 2 cycles, and median time to best response was 3 cycles.
 
The most frequently reported AEs were diarrhea (70%), nausea (50%), back pain (40%), constipation (40%), fatigue (40%), and peripheral edema (40%).

Conclusion
The combination of oral RIG and standard-dose AZA was well tolerated in repetitive cycles in pts with AML and MDS.  Response was observed both in HMA-treatment-naïve pts (85%) and in pts failing HMA therapy (62%), suggesting the addition of RIG can overcome HMA clinical resistance by acting as a chromatin modifying agent.  In AML, responses were seen in 37.5% of evaluable pts.  Based on these results, continued study in AML is warranted.  A Phase III study of the combination of oral RIG and AZA in pts with treatment naïve MDS is planned.

Session topic: 10. Myelodysplastic syndromes - Clinical

Keyword(s): Ras, MDS, Clinical Trial, AML

Abstract: S488

Type: Oral Presentation

Presentation during EHA22: On Saturday, June 24, 2017 from 16:30 - 16:45

Location: Room N105

Background
Azacitidine (AZA) is first line therapy for patients (pts) with higher risk MDS and demonstrated efficacy in older pts with AML (Dombret et al, Blood 2015; Fenaux et al, J Clin Oncol 2010)Rigosertib (RIG) interferes with the RAS-binding domains of RAF kinases and inhibits the RAS-RAF-MEK and the PI3Ks pathways.  In vitro, the combination of RIG with AZA synergistically inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of leukemic cells in a sequence-dependent manner (Skidan et al, AACR 2006). RIG’s effective inhibition of human hematopoietic tumor cell lines in vitro, favorable clinical adverse event (AE) profile, and its synergy with AZA suggests the potential value of combination treatment.

Aims
Phase I/II results are presented for pts with MDS, either hypomethylating (HMA) treatment naïve or progressing on or failing to respond to prior HMA, and those with AML (per WHO 2002 criteria) with relapsed or refractory disease

Methods
Oral RIG was administered twice daily on Day 1-21 of a 28-day cycle in escalating cohorts and then at the recommended Phase II dose (560 mg qAM and 280 mg qPM).  AZA 75 mg/m2/d SC or IV was administered for 7 days starting on Day 8. A CBC was performed weekly, and a bone marrow aspirate/biopsy were performed at baseline, D29, and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Response was determined by IWG criteria for MDS (2006) and AML (2003).  Stable disease in AML was defined as not meeting criteria for any other treatment response (CR, CRi, PR, disease progression, or treatment failure).

Results
The combination of oral RIG and AZA was administered to 54 pts, of whom 40 had MDS; HMA-treatment-naïve (N=23) and previously HMA-failed pts (N=17).  17 MDS pts received prior HMA therapy: 12 AZA, 4 decitabine, and 1 both.  Ten pts had AML, and 6 had CMML.  2 MDS patients with 20-<30% marrow blasts were also included in the AML analysis.  Median age was 68 years; 67% of pts were male; and ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 95% of pts.  Pts have received 1-37+ cycles of treatment (median, 3.5 cycles), with a median duration of treatment of 17 weeks (range 4 to 158+ weeks).

 
Of the 10 pts with AML, 6 had relapsed AML, 2 secondary AML and 2 with AML transformed from MDS. Eight pts were evaluable for response.  There were 3 responses seen, for an ORR of 37.5%, with responses in both secondary and refractory AML.  Two additional pts had stable disease (25%). Responses were durable, with the longest response approaching one year (Table 1).
 
Among 33 evaluable MDS pts, overall response by IWG criteria was 76%: complete remission (CR) in 8 (24%), concurrent marrow CR (mCR) and hematologic improvement (HI) in 10 (30%), mCR alone in 6 (18%), and HI alone in 1 (3%).  Overall response was 85% in HMA naïve pts and 62% in HMA resistant pts.  Correlative studies suggest that RIG has chromatin modifying effects in combination with AZA which may overcome clinical AZA resistance (Chaurasia EHA 2017). Median duration of CR was 8 months for the combination.  Median time to initial response was 2 cycles, and median time to best response was 3 cycles.
 
The most frequently reported AEs were diarrhea (70%), nausea (50%), back pain (40%), constipation (40%), fatigue (40%), and peripheral edema (40%).

Conclusion
The combination of oral RIG and standard-dose AZA was well tolerated in repetitive cycles in pts with AML and MDS.  Response was observed both in HMA-treatment-naïve pts (85%) and in pts failing HMA therapy (62%), suggesting the addition of RIG can overcome HMA clinical resistance by acting as a chromatin modifying agent.  In AML, responses were seen in 37.5% of evaluable pts.  Based on these results, continued study in AML is warranted.  A Phase III study of the combination of oral RIG and AZA in pts with treatment naïve MDS is planned.

Session topic: 10. Myelodysplastic syndromes - Clinical

Keyword(s): Ras, MDS, Clinical Trial, AML

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies