EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS
Author(s): ,
Darko Antic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Natasa Milic
Affiliations:
Medical school Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Srdjan Nikolovski
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Milena Todorovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Jelena Bila
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Predrag Djurdjevic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Bosko Andjelic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Vladislava Djurasinovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Aleksandra Sretenovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Mihailo Smiljanic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Vojin Vukovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Jelena Jelicic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
Biljana Mihaljevic
Affiliations:
Clinic for hematology,Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Antic D. 06/24/17; 181730; S443
Dr. Darko Antic
Dr. Darko Antic
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: S443

Type: Oral Presentation

Presentation during EHA22: On Saturday, June 24, 2017 from 12:00 - 12:15

Location: Room N103

Background

Actual guidelines recommend Padua and Khorana score for thromboembolic (TE) risk estimation for cancer patients in general. These existing models are quite limited for designation of lymphoma patients for TE events, as their development is not based on features specific for hematological patients. 

Aims
The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance of these suggested predictive models, as well as Thrombosis lymphoma (Throly) score, developed by our group, which is more specific for lymphoma patients.  

Methods

The study population included all consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), who were treated in the Lymphoma Departments of Clinical Center Serbia and Clinical Center Kragujevac in period from 2006 to 2014. Data for newly diagnosed and relapsed patients who had completed a minimum of one chemotherapy cycle were prospectively collected for all venous and arterial TE events from time of diagnosis to 3 months after the last cycle of therapy. Data for specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables known to be associated with TE from Padua and Khorana predictive scores were also extracted. Moreover, potential disease-related risk factors were gathered. The study population was divided based on a split-sample random method into the model developing and validation cohorts. The ThroLy model was developed using data solely from a derivation cohort, which included 1236 patients. Variables were evaluated by univariate logistic regression analysis, while the model was developed using a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Once a final model was defined, patients were divided into low risk and at risk groups. The final model was assessed in the validation cohort (584 patients). The studied population was also divided, based on Khorana and Padua score, into low risk and at risk groups.  

Results

The study population included 1820 eligible lymphoma patients. The mean patient's age was 53.1 years (range, 15–87 years). Most patients (83%) were newly diagnosed and had advanced stage disease: Ann Arbor stage III, 14.7% and stage IV, 44%. A total of 778 patients (42.7%) had high-grade lymphoma; 351 (19.3%) had low-grade lymphoma; 266 (14.6%) had HL; 156 (8.6%) had other forms; and 269 (14.8%) had CLL/SLL. Of all the patients included in the study, 99 (5.4%) developed at least one TE during the follow-up period. There were 73 patients with venous TE (73.7%), and 25 with arterial TE (25.3%), while 1 patient had both. Patients with aggressive NHL had significantly higher odds of developing TE compared to patients with any other lymphoma type (RR=1.5; 95% CI for RR 1.1–2.4; p=0.027). The incidence of thromboembolism was 81 (5.3%) in the newly diagnosed patients and 18 (6.2%) in relapsed patients. Overall, 35.4% (35/99) of the patients with thromboembolism experienced the event before the start of chemotherapy. The majority of patients (64.6%) had TE events during chemotherapy or within 3 months after chemotherapy. For patients classified at risk according to ThroLy score in derivation cohort, the model produced negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 25.1%, sensitivity of 75.4%, and specificity of 87.5%. In validation cohort PPV for Throly score was 28.9%. Padua and Khorana score had PPV of 15.5% and 14.8% in derivation, and 11.5% and 14.8% in validation cohort, respectively. 

Conclusion
Lymphoma patients are at increased risk of thromboembolic events but thromboprophylaxis in these patients is largely underused. ThroLy score is more specific for lymphoma patients than suggested Padua and Khorana score, but external validation in large prospective cohort studies is required.   

Session topic: 34. Thrombosis and vascular biology

Abstract: S443

Type: Oral Presentation

Presentation during EHA22: On Saturday, June 24, 2017 from 12:00 - 12:15

Location: Room N103

Background

Actual guidelines recommend Padua and Khorana score for thromboembolic (TE) risk estimation for cancer patients in general. These existing models are quite limited for designation of lymphoma patients for TE events, as their development is not based on features specific for hematological patients. 

Aims
The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance of these suggested predictive models, as well as Thrombosis lymphoma (Throly) score, developed by our group, which is more specific for lymphoma patients.  

Methods

The study population included all consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), who were treated in the Lymphoma Departments of Clinical Center Serbia and Clinical Center Kragujevac in period from 2006 to 2014. Data for newly diagnosed and relapsed patients who had completed a minimum of one chemotherapy cycle were prospectively collected for all venous and arterial TE events from time of diagnosis to 3 months after the last cycle of therapy. Data for specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables known to be associated with TE from Padua and Khorana predictive scores were also extracted. Moreover, potential disease-related risk factors were gathered. The study population was divided based on a split-sample random method into the model developing and validation cohorts. The ThroLy model was developed using data solely from a derivation cohort, which included 1236 patients. Variables were evaluated by univariate logistic regression analysis, while the model was developed using a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Once a final model was defined, patients were divided into low risk and at risk groups. The final model was assessed in the validation cohort (584 patients). The studied population was also divided, based on Khorana and Padua score, into low risk and at risk groups.  

Results

The study population included 1820 eligible lymphoma patients. The mean patient's age was 53.1 years (range, 15–87 years). Most patients (83%) were newly diagnosed and had advanced stage disease: Ann Arbor stage III, 14.7% and stage IV, 44%. A total of 778 patients (42.7%) had high-grade lymphoma; 351 (19.3%) had low-grade lymphoma; 266 (14.6%) had HL; 156 (8.6%) had other forms; and 269 (14.8%) had CLL/SLL. Of all the patients included in the study, 99 (5.4%) developed at least one TE during the follow-up period. There were 73 patients with venous TE (73.7%), and 25 with arterial TE (25.3%), while 1 patient had both. Patients with aggressive NHL had significantly higher odds of developing TE compared to patients with any other lymphoma type (RR=1.5; 95% CI for RR 1.1–2.4; p=0.027). The incidence of thromboembolism was 81 (5.3%) in the newly diagnosed patients and 18 (6.2%) in relapsed patients. Overall, 35.4% (35/99) of the patients with thromboembolism experienced the event before the start of chemotherapy. The majority of patients (64.6%) had TE events during chemotherapy or within 3 months after chemotherapy. For patients classified at risk according to ThroLy score in derivation cohort, the model produced negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 25.1%, sensitivity of 75.4%, and specificity of 87.5%. In validation cohort PPV for Throly score was 28.9%. Padua and Khorana score had PPV of 15.5% and 14.8% in derivation, and 11.5% and 14.8% in validation cohort, respectively. 

Conclusion
Lymphoma patients are at increased risk of thromboembolic events but thromboprophylaxis in these patients is largely underused. ThroLy score is more specific for lymphoma patients than suggested Padua and Khorana score, but external validation in large prospective cohort studies is required.   

Session topic: 34. Thrombosis and vascular biology

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies